Methods for journalists and scientists. Moving the program of meeting within the direction that is right

Posted by tempdude | July 11, 2018 | Posted in: Uncategorized | Comments (0)

Methods for journalists and scientists. Moving the program of meeting within the direction that is right

When it comes to duration that is optimal of interview, practice implies that 1 minute of oral message when decoding an meeting is corresponding to about 10 typewritten lines. Proceeding using this, it is crucial to gauge the period of the conversation using the area allocated with this in a magazine or mag, essay or research paper. Then it makes no sense to talk for more than 25-30 minutes (taking into account the fact that oral translation is always reduced in volume due to clearer formulations, deletions of repetitions, etc.) if the volume of the text should be 100-150 lines (2-3 pages – the standard size of the interview),. A journalist can usually ask three main questions (to touch on three topics) and 3-4 additional questions to each of them during this time. The rule is that they should be set “in depth” rather than “in breadth”, that is, to specify the details of what has already been said, and not to ask about new facts of the same order for additional questions.

The motion when you look at the meeting may take spot in four directions:

  • forward,
  • sideways,
  • backward,
  • slip at the center.

Going ahead and laterally when you look at the meeting

Going ahead is really a study that is gradual of topic or perhaps a transition from subject to topic. The movement is slow, in the second – fast in the first case. The speed that is optimal plumped for for each instance, however the journalist should avoid extremes-as an extortionate deepening when you look at the subject, when concerns begin to concern details which can be uninteresting to many visitors, and extortionate acceleration, if the journalist, after one concern on this subject, moves onto the next, then to yet the following and for that reason, none regarding the subjects are far more or less fully disclosed. Such an interview can resemble the scene through the window of the high-speed train that is electric with regards to a particular landscape to begin with, because it straight away comes to an end.

Movement into the side occurs when the main subject of conversation slips into an in depth discussion of any of their aspects. Additionally you have to act from the circumstances, however in any case, try not to lose control of some time ensure that it stays adequate stock to ask all of the primary questions regarding the subject or several subjects for the interview. Return to the primary backbone regarding the conversation does occur through the opening or filtering problems described above.

Movement backwards and sliding in the centre

Movement backwards happens if the journalist needs clarification and explanation of what had been stated. Often this will make feeling, but strategically, the backward movement should be prevented, as time is wasted, as well as the development of the subject will not happen.

Sliding in one single host to the meeting starts once the journalist calls into concern the statements of the interlocutor and starts to argue with him. Starting a dispute is very high-risk. It always has a lot of time, and it can turn out that the journalist simply won’t have time for you to ask his questions and will also be kept with nothing. In a case that is extreme you are able to come right into a dispute by the end of the meeting, once the responses to your main questions have been gotten.

Leave a Reply


main main